depends on the crime. But how can anyone take Ollie North seriously as
an anti-terrorist after Iran-Contra? Oh yeah, those were freedom
fighters. My bad.
I guess throwing around enough adjectives can make anything right :)
----- Original Message -----
From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: Interesting read from the Right about Bush's speech
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Excellent article.
Well said and all true. Ah, but since Ollie committed
a crime his words can be ignored no matter how true. I
guess everything Clinton ever said should be ignored
also :)
--- Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read through that far left crap that tends to
> dominate this list. And while
> doing so, I try desperately to ignore the BS and get
> to the nuggets that may
> exist. So plug through it. You might also consider
> the same questions I
> asked of Larry and his trash-talking, "Friday and my
> brain is dead" <g>
> response:
>
> 1. Are North's issues with the UN valid?
> 2. Doesn't his underlying theme of "waiting causes
> more harm" have historical
> validity?
>
> Andy
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
