If no voter intimidation exist, charge that it did
anyway?
-sm
--- Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, please. All they are saying is that the public
> should be made aware of the possiblility in places
> where these tactics were employed in the past. We
> know all too well how these tactics played into the
> 2000 election and that there is no recourse after
> election day so that best way to attack these things
> is to prevent them from happening at all.
>
> BTW - Drudge is a moron.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sam Morris
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 12:56 PM
> Subject: What's going on over there?
>
>
> http://www.drudgereport.com/dnc66.htm
>
> DNC ELECTION MANUAL: CHARGE VOTER INTIMIDATION,
> EVEN
> IF NONE EXISTS
>
> **World Exclusive**
>
> The Kerry/Edwards campaign and the Democratic
> National
> Committee are advising election operatives to
> declare
> voter intimidation -- even if none exists, the
> DRUDGE
> REPORT can reveal.
>
> A 66-page mobilization plan to be issued by the
> Kerry/Edwards campaign and the Democratic National
> Committee states: "If no signs of intimidation
> techniques have emerged yet, launch a 'pre-emptive
> strike.'"
>
> http://www.drudgereport.com/dnc.jpg
>
> The provocative Dem battle plan is to be
> distributed
> in dozens of states, the DRUDGE REPORT has
> learned.
>
> One top DNC official confirmed the manual's
> authenticity, but claimed the notion of crying
> wolf on
> any voter intimidation is "absurd."
>
> "We all know the Republicans are going to try to
> steal
> the election by scaring people and confusing
> people,"
> the top DNC source explained.
>
> Developing...
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We
> finish.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
