I was being a bit silly.  I live in a fairly rural area, and grew up in
one even farther removed from an urban environment.

Around here, there are few sidewalks, no grocery stores withing easy
walking distance of most homes, and no public transportation.  Wal*Mart
has a sidewalk out front, a grocery store inside (after all, it *is*
"Super"), and little carts you can ride if you are old, injured, or
absurdly lazy.  And, while getting there from most places around here
does require a car, it is most certainly a market center for the area,
which nearly qualifies as a hinterland.

Hmm.  Maybe I wasn't all that silly.  Damn.

--Ben

Won Lee wrote:
> At 16:42 9/27/2004 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>>I was using a definition something along the lines of contains
>>>sidewalks, is possible to walk to a grocery store, has public
>>>transportation and does not require  owning a car. Also, is market
>>>center for a hinterland.
>>
>>Around here, we call that "Wal*Mart".
>
>
> Having a WalMart automatically removes an area from the being a city.  Not
> because I don't like WalMart.  I actually love to go to WalMart when I
> visit VA, but because WalMart will not build in urban areas due to cost of
> business and competition.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to