> extra-marital trysts somehow had something to do with major accounting
> fraud scandals at large companies. I sincerely doubt a morally strong
> Clinton would of somehow persuaded these greed monkeys not to commit
> their crimes.
I'm not suggesting that Clinton bonking an intern led to the meltdown, although that would be a great plot-line for a movie! What I am suggesting is that Clinton's record for ethics in general is poor and his behavior fostered an ethically challenged environment. He is a politician, so we would have to grade him on an ethical curve, but let's face it, he's no Abe Lincoln.
I'm not suggesting anything about the morality of his behavior but the ethics of it. The issue with Monica isn't so much one of having an affair as it is having a sexual relationship with someone over whom you have so much control and influence. That's just plain ethically wrong. And that's just the tip of the Clinton iceberg for ethically poor judgement.
> On your second point, it's wishful spinning by the left to somehow
> think that France will change their anti-US policies the second John
> Kerry finishes his swearing in ceremony. Especially when people wake
> up to realize that Kerry and Bush's foreign policies aren't really
> looking all that different.
Agreed. I want to hear someone explain that to John Kerry and have him respond with what he would do differently than the President. And I want the President to respond with his plan to win the fight and bring peace, stability, and freedom to Iraq (his stated goals for the country). One of these two is going to be President and I think we all deserve to hear from them what they plan to do.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
