especially politicians. The really good people rarely run for office
and hardly ever for President. Our choices are among the character of
those that are running for President, not a theoretical candidate.
For example, Mr. Bush led the country to war on false pretenses and
refuses to admit mistakes, yet continues forward with no plan which
his own party is criticising him for. One the one had he praises the
CIA's work, on the other he says, "they're just guessing."
Is that great character? Mr. Clinton's transgressions are
comparatively nothing next to a person that leads his country into war
based on, by his own admission, faulty information.
You'll hear Mr. Bush say that "the whole world thought Iraq had WMD"
and then that our invasion wasn't a mistake even though we didn't find
any. That's logically inconsistent.
So my point is, yes, Mr. Clinton is flawed. But the enjoyment of sex
is a much smaller flaw than leading a country to war based on lies,
especially when our country can't afford it; not to mention the dead
soldiers, whose coffins our government doesn't allow us to see.
----- Original Message -----
From: G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:24:47 -0500
Subject: Re: The Election and The Economy
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Because only a fool would completely disregard character when
selecting who their leader should be.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
