her versus some other female. My guess would be that they had a
relationship of some nature. We have no idea what the nature was, but
they may have had many trists like this. Or she may have implied this
was ok. Who knows?
Again, all we can say is that Mr. Clinton seems to like sex. As for
the other claims, they are just claims and may just be piling on, or
similar to Ms. Jones' claim.
By the way, I'd make the same defense for Gov. Schwarzenegger, IL Sen
Ryan, or Kobe Bryant. In all cases the men are married and, while
there's of them liking sex, there's no real substance to the charges -
yet.
So, no, I don't see a pattern or even the beginning of a pattern.
----- Original Message -----
From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: The Election and The Economy
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
She was a state employee and he was the governor.
State troopers picked her up stating the governor
wanted to see her. They brought her to a hotel room
and he dropped his pants and told her to kiss it.
He also groped Kathleen Wiley and there was the
alleged Juanita Broderick rape. See the pattern yet?
-sm
--- Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think Ms. Jones was a subordinate and even
> if she were 1
> person doesn't make a pattern. Further I believe
> the allegation was
> that Mr. Clinton asked if she'd like to engage in
> sex - while that's
> not a smart thing, it's not abusive either.
>
> Even if every allegation were true it would mean:
> Mr. Clinton likes
> sex, and he's willing to have it with various women
> he's not married
> to.
>
> This isn't exactly a shocker to me nor is it a
> reason to impeach him.
> Which gets me back to my original point - why should
> we care?
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Messenger - Communicate in real time. Download now.
http://messenger.yahoo.com________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
