That's the thing they loved the man Clinton but now that he's on the back his actions are being judged.
Years after Reagan was president they Democrats called him the worst saying we'll suffer for years from Reaganomics. Eventually they agreed what he did worked. With Clinton they love the man not his strategies. Mostly Clinton went along with the Republicans in the Senate. As for Carter, you respect the man and I respect that. But I really dislike him and what he did. So I�ll leave it at that. -sm --- Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whoa. I think that Clinton's popular appeal is much > like Reagan. Both > are deified by their respective parties. I like > both Presidents > similarly but for different reasons. But the thing > that I like about > both of them is that they were both loved. The > admiration that Reagan > inspired by his inner circle seems to be greater, > while Clinton has more > mass appeal and more empathy for the common man. > > Clinton's Presidency is marked the greatest economic > prosperity. > > Carter, is a great man. I quietly wondered what > Carter would have done > if he were President during 9/11. Saying he would > let Americans be > taken hostage is a cheap shot. He didn't allow that > to happen. It was > an unfortunate coincidence which he has paid dearly > for. > > > -- > 2004 - The year $184M couldn't buy a pennant. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=36 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:133146 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
