Oh, that was you? I am relieved, cause I kind of snapped at you. But
yeah, I stand by my comment too, that this is not the middle. I
suppose you don't like my middle either?

I agree with you on sex education by the way. I think :) 

Dana


On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:03:12 -0500, Adam Haskell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made the comment of what I thought would be the middle and I stand
> by it :)  but I am not much a right wing person...
> 
> As for contraseption in schools...people whom still beleive the
> availability of comdoms will only allow for girls to go out and screw
> are either delusional, or lieing to themselves. Kids are being busted
> on buses in 7th grade for giving/recieving oral sex...yes 7th graders
> are giving BJs on buses. I have 2 friends that are teachers and both
> parents are teachers, well one is not a counseler in a middle school,
> I hear plenty of stories, I could go on all day. The point is kids are
> screwing the mode age a person losses thier virginity is now about 15,
> not the average the mode. Lets time I check at 15 most kids are in
> highschool. Condoms need to be available, classes need to be better,
> and kids need more info your face examples of what happens when you
> screw around with sex. Bring in a 30 yr that had 4 abortions and now
> can;t have kids, bring in a guy that can barely stand to pee b/c it
> burns so bad. Bring in that lvely smiling herpes infected casher at
> the local liquor store have her tell her storie. now I am frothing....
> 
> Adam H
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:54:06 -0700, dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Probably the person who proposed his definition does not consider
> > himself far right wing though. Who was that, anyway? I hope I didn't
> > run a newcomer off. Muffins? <g>
> >
> > Dana
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:45:17 -0600, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You won't find a "middle" from the far right perspective. By the very fact
> > > that they are on the "far right", ALL opinions that do not agree with their
> > > own are, by their definition, "left wing".
> > >
> > > If life begins at conception, and all premeditated termination of human life
> > > is murder (the basis of the far right argument), then you cannot and will
> > > not find a "middle road" for this issue. This belief eliminates the
> > > possibility for compromise, rendering ALL abortions immoral, no matter the
> > > surrounding circumstances.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Been thinking about this....
> > > >
> > > > So does the religious right consider the status quo on this issue to
> > > > be "left-wing"? If banning all abortions except for rape and threats
> > > > to the life of the mother is centrist, as someone suggested yesterday,
> > > > it would seem so.
> > > >
> > > ><snip>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
http://www.cfhosting.net

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:134181
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to