Both. But probably the lady first (precedent setting), and then the pharmacist on appeal if he/she loses.
Jerry Johnson >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/10/04 01:27PM >>> I got a hypothetical question for ya. Lets say the pharmacist refuses to sell the pills. Consequently, the pharmacy hears of this, and fires the pharmacist on the spot for, basically, not performing their duties on the job. Would the ACLU file suit on behalf of the lady and her right to legally receive the pills, or on behalf of the pharmacist and his right to refuse to sell the pills????? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:135202 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
