> Robert wrote: > It's a bunch of hooey. The entire exercise rests on the flawed assumption > that the polls were conducted correctly
Isn't it a "flawed assumption" to assume they weren't? In fact, all the report is saying is that the odds of all of the exit polls in all 3 states being consistently conducted wrong is extremely low, almost impossibly so. The first rule of science is to assume nothing and let the facts speak rather than your pre-conceived notions. In this case, the facts say that your assumption, that there was widespread consistent pollster error , is very low. Further, I'm more concerned about fair and accurate elections than your partisan accusations. Truth be told, Mr. Bush's election has already given me a huge financial boost. Throwing the election into doubt would not be good for the markets, and reversing it would be worse, not only within the markets, but for my taxes. We've had 2 elections that have left room for doubt and that's not a good thing. Rise above your partisanship for a minute - there's a broader and more important issue here. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:135842 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
