Gee!
I did not know that Hubbard did that.  It is amazing how many people commented
about the Jerry Falwell defense.

True,  I don't like Falwell but I know a lot of people who do.  There are 
many people
in the US who would vote for him without thinking about it.

The real danger, I feel, is not the Falwells and the Ladens of the 
world.  It is the people
who are so willing to do their bidding.

I like scifi but never got interested in reading Hubbard.  I now have a 
reason to not read
him.

At 09:23 AM 10/30/2001 -0600, Russel Madere wrote:
>If he were such a "great American" he wouldn't be spewing the same racist
>garbage as L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of the "pagan" Church of Scientology
>and author of the Battlefield Earth series.
>
>Russel
>
>Know thy enemy.
>anon
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:20 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Picking on the Great Jerry Falwell
> >
> >
> > You guys are being unfair in picking on one of the greatest Americans
> > living.  He is a guy of high moral standings, a man who has unselfishly
> > dedicated his life to serving God and to serving mankind.  He is
> > one of the
> > few honest men in the nation.
> >
> > At 05:41 PM 10/29/2001 -0500, Mark Stewart wrote:
> > >I have a relative that actually went to Liberty U. Knowing him before
> > >and after he attended, I can say that they really messed his brain up.
> > >There's some really far out ideology being passed around that place.
> > >
> > >Mark
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:59 PM
> > >To: CF-Community
> > >Subject: RE: Falwell like the Taliban ( was Re[2]: beauuuuutiful Friday)
> > >
> > >
> > >Having lived in the area and seen the impact of Mr. Falwell on
> > >Lynchburg,
> > >believe me comparisons to the Taliban are not far off.
> > >
> > >larry
> > >
> > >--
> > >Larry C. Lyons
> > >ColdFusion/Web Developer
> > >EBStor.com
> > >8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204
> > >Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795
> > >tel:   (703) 393-7930
> > >fax:   (703) 393-2659
> > >Web:   http://www.ebstor.com
> > >        http://www.pacel.com
> > >email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
> > >--
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:45 PM
> > > > To: CF-Community
> > > > Subject: Re: Falwell like the Taliban ( was Re[2]:
> > > > beauuuuutiful Friday)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Gel,
> > > >
> > > >     It is one thing to have extreme, oppressive, fundamentalist views
> > > > and something else to act on them.  It would be a more accurate to
> > > > compare Neo-Nazi's and the KKK to the Taliban rather than Falwell or
> > > > Robertson.  The difference is the actions taken.  Even if you
> > > > extrapolate their views and give them action, they are not a militant
> > > > group.  They are ideologues that use words to persuade, not
> > > > force.  So,
> > > > while living in an environment dominated by such thought would be
> > > > horrible, it would not be equally comparable to the life of the
> > > > Afghanistani people or to those that visit there.  Whether or
> > > > not there
> > > > are different facets of the Taliban is irrelevant.  The facet that
> > > > controls the country and dictates policy is relevant.  I'm sure that
> > > > there is a "kinder gentler" side of the KKK, but does that change the
> > > > very nature of the beast?  No.
> > > >
> > > > Michael Corrigan
> > > > Programmer
> > > > Endora Digital Solutions
> > > > www.endoradigital.com
> > > > 630/942-5211 x-134
> > > >   ----- Original Message -----
> > > >   From: Angel Stewart
> > > >   To: CF-Community
> > > >   Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 11:16 AM
> > > >   Subject: Falwell like the Taliban ( was Re[2]: beauuuuutiful Friday)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   The taliban are oppressive fundamentalists in their views.
> > > >   There are different facets of the Taliban, and in this context it
> > > > should
> > > >   be obvious which such facets are being referred to.
> > > >
> > > >   The Taliban are narrowminded and obtuse in their religions views and
> > > >   laws.Similarly, so is Falwell's views. Extrapolate this to living
> > > > under
> > > >   a state guided by Falwell's principles.
> > > >
> > > >   -Gel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   -----Original Message-----
> > > >   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > >
> > > >   I disagree wholeheartedly with that statement.  I'm no fan
> > > > of Falwell
> > > > or
> > > >
> > > >   Robertson, but I don't see them advocating killing people
> > > > from other
> > > >   religions.  I don't see them condemning women from receiving an
> > > >   education or participating in the workforce.  I certainly don't see
> > > > them
> > > >
> > > >   in support of organizations that murder innocent civilians
> > > > or building
> > > > a
> > > >
> > > >   rebellious and violent movement to overthrow the government
> > > > to force
> > > > all
> > > >
> > > >   Americans to subscribe to their religious beliefs.  I don't believe
> > > > that
> > > >
> > > >   they support terrorism of any kind.  If you have proof contrary to
> > > > this
> > > >   then I'd like to see it.  But to equate Robertson and
> > > > Falwell to Bin
> > > >   Laden or the Taliban is frankly narrow minded and obtuse.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to