I agree here. I was offended, but I did not say it should be taken down. Such a cartoon should be a catalyst for discussion, much like what is going on here.
While I was offended, I am willing to give my very life to protect that cartoonist's right to offend me with his art. I took an oath to defend the Constitution and it did not end with the end of my military obligation. Russel Madere Webmaster 504.832.9835 SunShine Pages by EATEL www.sunshinepages.com -----Original Message----- From: Chris Stoner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 8:39 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Dr. and future Secretary Rice [snip] Gruss Gott wrote: >Who knows how long that will be around, however, if a majority of >people start making arguments like yours. > > My only argument is (and has been) that this cartoon IS offensive (if only to some). No where did I say he didn't have a right to be offensive. Nor did you (that I have seen) until this reply. Up until this reply you have been suggesting that this cartoon was/is not offensive NOT questioning its constitutional right to be so. I find it odd that you would even try to slip that (implying i was trying to censor this) into the discussion. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:136882 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
