Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is completely wrong.
How is it completely wrong? It could be completely right. The question is, were marijuana legal, how many more people could we expect to use it? This data must be available from Michigan, Alaska, California and the other states where it's legal. I'm guessing it's a very low percentage. Personally I don't know anyone who doesn't use it because it's illegal. Of course the question is, what does "legal" mean? That is, is the use limited and, if so, how? My suggestion would be legal for home use only; no bars, clubs, etc. There are already states that have that. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:138078 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
