Yah, that's what I said. quote from email that you just responded to: > > But, it doesn't support Nick's claim. ;)
I was being snide, in that the first scholarly article that came up on scholar.google.com essentially refutes Nick's claim. On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:56:34 -0500, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How so? The most damning piece in the abstract just says > "The data support a 'drug residue' effect on attention, psychomotor > tasks, and short-term memory during the 12-24 h period immediately > after cannabis use, but evidence is as yet insufficient to support or > refute either a more prolonged 'drug residue' effect, or a toxic > effect on the central nervous system that persists even after drug > residues have left the body." > > In other words no long lasting effects beyond the 12 - 24 h period. > Evidence is as yet insufficient to support or refute a more prolonged > effect suggests to me that the chances are that there is not such an > effect. Or if there is then its so small that its masked by other > factors. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - New Atlanta http://www.newatlanta.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:138293 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
