ROFLMAO!

Now they are making chips that shut themselves off or scale back their 
processing output when they get too hot, to prevent
overheating!
So if you're chip says 3.8Ghz, you will only be able to get that speed in short 
bursts! 
Hahahah!

Oh lord why isn't AMD Marketing raking them over the coals for this? 
Oh wait..I forgot...AMD doesn't have any marketing ^_^

"Based on what we�ve seen here, however, I�d recommend anyone interested in an 
E0 3.6 or higher pay careful attention to ambient
temperature and aftermarket cooling.  If our 3.8 GHz results are at outlier 
that�s one thing, but I�m not at all convinced they
are�and if they aren�t, it means that Prescott is essentially incapable of 
running at 3.8 GHz all the time, at full load, unless
kept in a thermally advantageous environment in an open case.   There�s a 
counterpoint to this statement, namely that most users
will never notice a little throttling and that many products that are �rated� 
at certain capacities are only rated for those
capacities for a limited time.  These are both good arguments, but we�ve never 
bought processors under such a paradigm.  When I buy
a power supply, I understand that it can�t produce 400 watts constantly.  When 
I buy a car, I expect it to balance on all four tires
100% of the time when under normal operating conditions.  I don�t expect one 
tire to lift off the ground every 4th second when the
car is moving 70 mph.  

When considered across the speed grades it�ll be deployed in and the relatively 
light usage corporate machines receive, E0 is a
great idea that�ll save businesses money, both in terms of power costs and 
(hopefully) security problems.  The 3.8 GHz model (and
possibly the 3.6 as well), however, are running too close to their 
throttle-points.  If you intend to use your system for CPU
intensive tasks that�ll leave it running at full load for significant periods 
of time, I�d carefully consider the additional costs
necessary to make that operating mode possible.  You may find, upon 
consideration, that either a slower Prescott or an AMD Athlon 64
make better sense.  "

http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=630&pid=2383

-Gel
Spreading the truth about Intel, for a better tomorrow ^_^


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics
http://www.cfdynamics.com

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:138799
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to