the independent variables weren't
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:25:18 -0500, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Um...could you repeat that...in English? > > All I got was "Geek. Geek. Geek. Independant. Geek. Geek." > > =) > > Jerry Johnson > Web Developer > Dolan Media Company > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/18/05 12:26PM >>> > Moreover in terms of the stats they used, well there were a lot of > articles in various journals that examined the statistics they used > and the general conclusion was that the statistical analysis was so > flawed as to be worthless. The 3 variable model they used was so bad - > the so called independent variables were correlated beyond .50 level, > that it should have been tossed out from the start. There was no > statisical controls for uneven baselines for instance. Unfortunately > the author who was responsible for the analysis died before > publication, so the reasoning for the choice of stats cannot be > determined to any extent. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:143284 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
