Probably because most of it is so stupid! And so patently false! But make me say it why don't you. On this particular issue he is quite correct. Except for the part where he calls himself an advocate of free speech :)
Yes, if you care going to let your children watch a performance filled with sexual innuendo, you have no grounds for whining when they glimpse a nipple shield. Dana On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:15:17 -0800, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are also alot of people out there who've adopted "strongly > disagree with everything that comes out of Bush's mouth" as a way of > life. > > -Cameron > > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:11:27 -0600, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I disagree with you, Jim, strongly. I think a LOT of people will > > disagree with him, and that is part of the problem. They would much > > rather have the government take care of monitoring their TV shots for > > them so they don't have to. -grumble- > > > > > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:47:23 -0600, Jim Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Truly, but really, nobody is going to disagree with that. Of course, > > > actually hanging the bell around the cat's neck is the real problem. > > > > > > - Jim > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Captivate from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=52 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:145668 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
