i hope and pray that they build on what they've made, and only make it better, more secure, and just as compliant as they need to be...
tw On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:12:59 -0400, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >It's fine and dandy to make IE more-secure, but will they actually do > >any work on getting it to follow standards? > > > >I would guess *not* since standard-compliancy is not a sexy term for > >marketing the product. > > I have high hopes. IE releases have been, since v4, very standards > compliant. Rememember that IE 6 is actually quite compliant to standards - > but only those standards finalized when it was released three years ago. > It's problem is not that it flouted standards - its that the standards it > does support are antique. > > MS could and have patched it to maintain compliance, but didn't. Still, I > doubt they'll let a new version number out without addressing this. > Otherwise this would just be IE "6.5" (and I hope they learned their lesson > about half-assed releases with IE 5.5). > > Jim Davis > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:147284 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
