So you are advocating our government's definition of marriage exactly mirror the Catholic Church's definition of marriage? I didn't think so.
The argument that Yves seemed to be making was that he saw that there we "good" and "bad" marriages. The difference between them being that "good" marriages advanced the biological (and biblical) agenda of "fruitfulness". (Please excuse the pun.) I was pointing out that many "bad" marriages (by the definition of biology) were currently supported by our government's (and those many religions) definition of marriage. And that gay marriage (or no marriage) could be considered "good" if it advanced the biological imperative (Melissa Ethridge has 2 kids, doesn't she?). Jerry Johnson Web Developer Dolan Media Company >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/24/05 12:42PM >>> The catholic church, and many other religions, that have been formulating their doctrines for hundreds of years, would be against many of the things on your list. While I don't agree with their views, I can't really call them "poorly thought out". ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:148188 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
