The US and Canada have shared in the defense of the skies for years. Are they in favor of getting nuked, or the US getting nuked?
Do I think it is a good system, no, do I think we need a good system that can accommodate this threat, yes. If a missile is headed for the US and could kill a few million people and destroy the US economy and with it a major portion of the world economy, and we have to go through Canadian air space to effetely stop that threat, then we go. > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 12:08 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: No Defense over Canada > > So its OK to violate another nation's sovereignty whenever you want > and with no consequences. I guess the converse would also be true, > other nations can violate US airspace at will then without > consequences. > > Typical US attitude - screw the rest of the world, especially your > allies. Real brilliant.It will get to the point that the only US > allies will be paid. > > As for the missile tracks - remember where a good third of the ICBM's > are based, and how many of those russian nukes are really controlled > by Moscow. > > larry ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:148569 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
