I guess you have a different outlook on casualties and the cost of war than professional warriors.
Do me a favor and leave fighting the wars to the professionals. I'll keep working with them as long as they consider me a peer. Russel Madere Webmaster 504.832.9835 SunShine Pages by EATEL www.sunshinepages.com -----Original Message----- From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 3:54 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Maybe Bush Was Right? > Russel wrote: > You still have nothing to say about the cost of the war, just making it > more palatable. You asked how it could be made cheaper. I said by involving a global alliance such as Mr. Bush's father did. During that war the US covered 10% of the cost and 0% of the reconstruction. In this war the US is covering over 90% of the cost AND reconstruction. > As for the 6 percent, that just says that US troops performed 94% better > than expected. That is like saying you nearly doubled your profits for > the year over the expected. > No, it's like saying that you lost 94% less than you expected. But you still lost while your competitors profitted, because you have a stupid business model. This is a case of bad idea, good execution for the invasion. It's still a bad idea! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how to get a fax number that sends and receives faxes using your current email address http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=64 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:148682 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
