I would appreciate it if you would flesh that out a little. It sounds like you're saying that the very idea of opposition to the Supreme Court's decision was only disseminated by Dan Rather, and I'm sure that's not what you meant.
- Jim Sam wrote: >Doesn't matter, he's still planted the thought. > >On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:34:59 -0700, Dana wrote: > > >>because that would be editorializing. Rather, on the other hand, gave >>his audience credit for knowing that some does not mean all. >>Especially since from what I remember of that election there was >>pretty much non-stop coverage of both sides for about three weeks..... >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| All-in-one: antivirus, antispam, firewall for your PC and PDA. Buy Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=60 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:150141 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
