Oh and while we are talking about the court -- it apparently refused to allow 33 affidavits from doctors saying that she should be re-evaluated. I can't explain the court's position, but I think it is wrong and should be reviewed.
Dana On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:24:36 -0600, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the contrary they found someone, but the court dismissed him. > > http://www.miami.edu/ethics/schiavo/1-05-04%20Schindlers%20petition%20to%20reappoint%20GAL.htm > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:10:20 -0600, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Larry wrote: > > > Given the scruiteny she's been under for the last 10 years or so, I > > > don't think that a misdiagnosis would still remain in effect > > > > I believe that's the whole reason behind the stays - the family has > > been searching for someone to assert that she's not a PVS case, but > > can't. The additional time was granted in an attempt to find such a > > doctor, but none has been found (yet). > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:150711 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
