> Dana wrote:
> I *could* point out that Gruss doesn't want us to interfere in
> families.

Have some guts!  You took the shot anyway, you just pointed it over my
head.  I not so entirely humorless that I wouldn't have laughed -
which I did.  Good one :)

You're right though, I think the gov't should stay out of family
business *unless* there's a clear and present danger to the community
which, in this case, there was.  In that case I think the government
definitely has the right to approach the family privately to make the
case.

You're trying to compare apples and oranges.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151591
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to