> Robert Munn wrote: > Nice try, but it's a tax cut. The "subsidy to the wealthy" line is just the
Here's why you're wrong: If you simultaneously cut taxes and raise costs all you've effectively done is shift taxes somewhere else while also raising them. Why? Because the money is already spoken for by existing spending, but now you've got new spending which you need to borrow to fund (in addition to old spending we're already borrowing to fund). That new borrowing requires interest payments which raises costs even more! Your thinking is caught up in a type of bang 'em gopher game. You think that just because you bopped your gopher on the head there are no more gophers. What you don't realize is that 3 more just popped up elsewhere. In this case Mr. Bush has just shifted the tax burden from the wealthy to debt. The payments on that debt kick in 2010 plus interest. Who do you think will get stuck with the bill? The wealthy, or you? WISE UP! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:152521 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
