This is about what I am starting to think. A case of users using both one another, and the child. Personally I think he *is* guilty, but I am happy to admit that first of all, I have not been following the case all that closely and second, that if I were on the jury I am not sure I would be convinced enough to convict. There's no question that it would be the end of his career in bubble-gum rock. On the other hand if he IS guilty, they say pedophiles always re-offend... I don't know how true that is but if I were on the jury that might push me from 96% sure to 99% sure...
Dana On 4/19/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think this is a classic case of a grifter trying to profit from > > people that have it in for MJ no matter what the evidence is. > > > > You know, the more and more I hear and read about this case, the more I'm > beginning to wonder if this is case where the mother and her family are > indeed grifters trying to extort money from MJ.....AND Jackson molested the > kids! > > The mom certainly seems to care more about the money than she does her > kids...and there certainly seems to be an awful lot of circumstantial > evidence and independent witness statements to prove that MJ molested this > child. > > Both parties seem to be monsters in this case....leaving only one real > victim, as usual: the children. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:154508 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
