NABLA and Martin Luther King are both entitled to free speech. It's possibly their only point of similarity.
And yes, the ACLU was on the other side from me in the Schiavo thing, I did see that. I felt they were wrong in that instance, but in general they stand up for things that need to be stood up for. If they were wrong, it was for the right reasons. They assumed that she would have wanted to die, and the rest of their position is logical if you accept that. Dana On 5/10/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ACLU Joins With Schiavo Legal Team to Ask a Pinellas Judge to Strike > Special Law That Reverses Court Order, Violates Patient's Privacy > Rights > http://www.aclu.org/Privacy/Privacy.cfm?ID=14246&c=27 > > :P > > > I am not equating NAMBLA with Martin Luther King mind you > Sounds like you are > > > On 5/10/05, Dana wrote: > > ok so, all those lunch counter sit-ins and public transportation > > boycotts in the south in the sixties... those were against the > > constitution? Those people should have been locked up without the > > benefit of their constitutional rights?? I am not equating NAMBLA > > with Martin Luther King mind you, just making the point that at times > > breaking the law may in fact *be* free speech. > > > > I also have to say that I don't know that the description of NAMBLA is > > accurate -- this is obviously a partisan account, one side of a court > > proceeding. > > > > Dana > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:157035 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
