It really is a sharp development platform. Once you wrap your brain around OOP (took a littlle bit for me), it's very powerful. That and I'm too impatient for Java >:-)
Adam Churvis wrote: >It's good to see some *positive* CF-Community press on ASP.NET for a change! >:) > >If you're interested in adding C# and ASP.NET 2.0 to your repertoire (always >good for the job market), check this out: > >http://www.productivityenhancement.com/training/Itinerary.cfm?coursecode=CSHARP > >It will make you a *much* better application designer and programmer. > >Respectfully, > >Adam Phillip Churvis >Member of Team Macromedia >http://www.ProductivityEnhancement.com > >Download Plum and other cool development tools, >and get advanced intensive Master-level training: > >* C# & ASP.NET for ColdFusion Developers >* ColdFusion MX Master Class >* Advanced Development with CFMX and SQL Server 2000 > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Matthew Small" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> >Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:09 AM >Subject: RE: ASP.net 2.0 > > > > >>Honestly, I do like it better for two main reasons: >> >>1) OOP - rally using OOP is nice because I've actually written libraries >> >> >of > > >>objects that I can reuse across websites. >> >>2) Webforms - Being able to respond to events without worrying about the >>rest of the information on the form is an advancement in web programming >>light-years ahead of any technology that does not use it. >> >>- Matt Small >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:05 AM >>To: CF-Community >>Subject: Re: ASP.net 2.0 >> >>It's all a natural progression. I liked Commodore Basic. Then Turbo >>Pascal came along. Then Turbo C came along. Then Borland Builder >>came along. Then CF came along. Finally, DotNet is showing some >>maturity and ease of use. Someday I just might like it better than >>CF. :) >> >> >>On 5/18/05, Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>Hmmm... not too funny. Not that I use CF all that much anymore myself, >>> >>> >>but if CF loses its status as the only "RAD" server technology, there >> >> >won't > > >>be ANY reason to use it over .NET. >> >> >>>- Matt Small >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Eric Carlisle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 9:50 AM >>>To: CF-Community >>>Subject: Re: ASP.net 2.0 >>> >>>It's hilarious... >>><asp:cfquery stolenfrom="ColdFusion"/> >>> >>>Marlon Moyer wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>I'm reading a book about ASP.NET 2.0 that's produced by MSFT. It's >>>>cracking me up though because they keep talking about how easy CFQuery >>>>is compared to ASP.NET 1.0 and how they learned from it in ASP.NET >>>>2.0. I have to agree with them though, they did learn a lot from CF. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=11 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:158043 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
