You're missing your own point. Your point was Bush way outspent Kerry to influence the election. When in fact a lot more was spent against Bush. Bush didn't win because of his advertising.
Sorry it was Dave Kopel that poiinted out the Moore lies. Speaking of paying for news hehehe http://www.theconservativevoice.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=5847 Clear and convincing evidence indicates that billionaire money manipulator and anti-conservative activist George Soros provided financing for research on a CNN documentary. On 5/31/05, Dana wrote: > You too are entitled to spend millions to support, or attempt to > remove from office, the candidate of your choice. It's called free > speech. What a concept, eh? > > On the other hand I do object to the government paying people to write > supposedly independent op-ed pieces supporting their proposals. > Especially when this amounts to millions that could have been better > spent. > > RE alleged Moore lies, I don't recall the New York Times proving > anything of the kind. I do know that many of his allegations were > made, and documented, elsewhere. You seem to have this persistent > mental hiccup where you assume that any derogatory statement about > this administration is a lie... > > Dana > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:159264 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
