> Robert wrote: >That's less than an afternoon rape and torture session for Udai Hussein (before he > was pushing up daises).
Yes but we invaded their country without provocation and claimed they violated international laws that we've yet to find evidence they did. That's not to say that Hussein wasn't a bad man, but is it your argument the US should be the world's policeman? That we should hopscotch the globe invading countries whose ruling powers are committing atrocities? If not, then how was Iraq different? > The great irony, of course, is that if Al Qaeda or the Taliban were in charge > in the To me the great irony is that there very likely wouldn't be an Al Qaeda had we not gone on our military adventure to Iraq that's turned out to: 1.) Have nothing to do with WMD, 2.) Have nothing to do with global terrorism, and 3.) Have sucked 90% of our military resources from the war against global terrorists and put them in the crosshairs of local terrorists. Military success, like business success, is dependant on the proper allocation of resources. Mr. Bush happens to have bankrupted every company he started and, from the look of our military and financial balance sheets, he's still doing what he's always done. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Stay Ahead of Hackers - Download ZoneAlarm Pro http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=65 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:159386 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
