Why must it be only "the logic of many on the right"? I think that most people (right or left) would consider statements from a person suspect if there was a history of lying.
Matthew Small Web Developer American City Business Journals 704-973-1045 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: William Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 3:08 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Schiavo Gets In Last Dig > Fox News claimed he was nominated for a Nobel Prize but that's not > technically accurate. _He_ claimed he was nominated. >From the above referenced link: "Hammesfahr* testified during an October 2002 court hearing on the Schiavo case that his claim to be a Nobel nominee is based on a letter written by Rep. Mike Bilirakis (R-FL) recommending him for the prize." Fox News merely repeated the "fib" ad nauseum. > What's that have to do with the discredited autopsy? Well, to follow the logic of many on the right, once you told a lie, everything else you say for the rest of eternity must be treated with contempt, no? Therefore, he lied about this, what _else_ is he lying about? ;-) -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable." - Carrie Fisher ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:161454 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
