"Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private party, but the fallout from this decision will not be random," O'Connor wrote. "The beneficiaries are likely to be those citizens with disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms."
loathe wrote: > This is just wrong. > > Jacob wrote: > >>WASHINGTON (AP) -- -- The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that private homes >>and businesses may seize government properties-- even against their will -- >>for personal and private development. >> >>=) >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 8:26 AM >>To: CF-Community >>Subject: But we need to build a bypass! >> >>WASHINGTON (AP) -- -- The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that local >>governments may seize people's homes and businesses -- even against >>their will -- for private economic development. >>http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/23/scotus.property.ap/index.html >> >>-Kevin >> >> >> >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:161738 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
