*that* federal agency? Don't you mean all current federal agencies? Dana
> expertise in that area. It just so happens that in this case that > federal agency is being run by people who do not have the best > interests of US resident citizens in mind. They much prefer > corporations with money. > > On 6/27/05, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I thought the ruling was that reporters were allowed to protect their > > sources? Did I misread the article? > > > > > Consider this situation, lets say the CIA is involved with > > > torturing > > > american citizens (its an example), and someone who > > > objects to this > > > violation tells a reporter. He also tells them that if > > > exposed it may > > > at least mean jail time for him if not his life. > > > > > So the reporter writes up the story and the CIA now can > > > compell him to > > > reveal his sources. Bye bye whistleblower in this case. > -- > "My mind is a scary place." The Tick > > Now blogging.... > http://www.blivit.org/blog/index.cfm > http://www.blivit.org/mr_urc/index.cfm?sectionid=2 > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:162101 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
