Oh. :) Sorry, I wasn't really following along....
Ray Jerry Johnson wrote: > We weren't talking about the actions of two consenting adults. (Which > argument all by itself works fine for me, as long as I don't have to > watch) > We were talking about forbidding actions that are "natural" to a > minority segment of the population due to uncontrollable physiolocial > differences. > > The conservatism (and the follow on .net line) was a joke. > > On 7/6/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Well, I think in all of those cases we are no longer talking about the >>actions of two consenting adults. In each of those cases (except >>conservatism, not sure how that even fits), someone is getting hurt in >>some way, be it psychologically, monetarily, etc. >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Studio MX with Flash Pro from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=51 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:163290 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
