+1 Larry (Serial Killer) Lyons
On 7/8/05, Jennifer Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately, it can be very difficult to convict someone of domestic > abuse. But to accuse a judge of ignoring evidence "because [he] is > such a nice guy" is really out of line. It is particularly out of line > because it's wasn't a single judge who found the testimony in question > to be not believable. As someone has already mentioned, you've libeled > someone who has already been found legally in the right, now not just > one judge, but every judge that has ever been involved with this case, > and the prosecutor who found that all of those judges were correct. > > I'm sorry of this topic hits a little too close to home for you. > However, just because domestic abuse happens doesn't mean that it > happened in this case. And even if it did happen in the relationship > in question, that doesn't mean that it was the cause of the injuries > that left her braindead. > > Apparently attempting to force your personal religious beliefs on your > braindead daughter is perfectly legitimate, as is ignoring the > diagnosis of every doctor who examined your daughter in person, as is > accusing your son-in-law of domestic violence without any evidence > other than your word and doing so as an afterthought, having already > lost your legal battle to impose your religious beliefs on your > braindead daughter. > > I seriously doubt that you are a professional criminal profiler, or > you wouldn't be on this mailing list. I doubt that your opinion on his > "fitting the profile" means anything other than that you are repeating > the opinion of another party to the case, probably someone in her > family. Criminal profiling is inexact, especially when weilded by a > layman. You can fit the profile and not be guilty. Seriously. How many > affluent white males between 30-40 do we have around here? They are > all clearly serial killers. Let's just lock them up now and get it > over with. > > On 7/8/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is evidence. It was presented at one or another of the hearings > > (who cares which at this point) and the judge chose to disregard it > > because Schiavo is so obviously a nice guy :) Which is par for the > > course and really not that surprising. > > > > There almost never is enough evidence because women don't talk about > > it, families don't talk about it, and when they do they are not > > believed because good old so and so would never do a thing like that. > > > > So it is not exactly earthshaking to hear that the county that felt > > there was no evidence of domestic violence now feels that there is no > > evidence of homicide, fifteen years after the fact. > > > > By the way, Shiavo's subsequent girlfriend *did* accuse him of > > stalking her and threatening her children. She was not believed at the > > hearing because she got the hell out of dodge rather than call the > > police at the time. > -- > "You can't destroy EVERYthing. Where would you sit?" The Tick > > Now for hire... > http://www.blivit.org/mr_urc/index.cfm > > Now blogging.... > http://www.blivit.org/blog/index.cfm > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Homesite Plus with Dreamweaver from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=55 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:163857 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
