>> Ike wrote: >> I hope you're joking. > Why would I joke with you?
> http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=47301 > 09 Well the lead researcher at least seems to present a reasonable response to questions about it... I do think it's a gross oversimplification to say that there aren't (or aren't many) bisexual men because a study of only 100 people doesn't turn up a lot of self-proclaimed bisexual people who are aroused by visual imagery of other men (which, based on the description I would _guess_ was pictures of just men/women by themselves rather than pictures of gay/straight sex - I personally am rarely physically aroused by pictures of an individual, even one I consider to be dead-sexy). Plus, visual imagery doesn't begin to account for the fact that a person can be un-aroused by visual stimulus and yet, in a room with another consenting person of the same sex still be aroused (as was my case before I discovered better gay-porn. :P ). It doesn't sound to me like a very good study -- and in all honesty, I rather think that the subject matter is sort of inherently difficult to study and especially difficult to study in the US as a result of all the legal restrictions we have on sex. s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.fusiontap.com http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:164049 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
