> Loathe  wrote:
> 1. These are not U.S. citizens so therefore not entitled to the same rights
> as American's

No argument there, and, had they been killed on the battlefield, I'd
have no problem with that.  And, for me, this is a tough issue.  But.

What message do we send to the world if we're holding people
indefinitely?  What does that say about our principles?  And does that
threaten our freedom?  To me, it does.

Now that's not to say they need a trial such as an American would get,
but they should get something - even if that something is a bi-yearly
review.  It just seems to me that we need to go that extra step to
show that, even under fire, we uphold our principles.

There's got to be a better solution.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:164348
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to