So Clintons negative press coverage was lower because he was a better President? Who decides that? I don't want people like Dan Rather telling me what to think.
On 7/14/05, Gruss Gott wrote: > The federal gov't does a fine job of getting it's message out without > the press. There's the Whitehouse spokesman, televised speeches, news > releases, weekly radio addresses, CSPAN, etc. > > The press, however, should be our challenge to the gov't. Sure, let's > have E! and OLN, and let them report on non-political stuff. > > But if there's reporter talking to the administration, I want a > constant challenge on what's being said. If all I want is the > Whitehouse publicity, why have the press? I can just get the > propaganda first hand from the Whitehouse. > > What you're asking for is the Whitehouse News Network (WNN). They > simply televise what the latest message is. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Captivate from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=52 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:164811 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
