I don't think they know why it worked, but I'd call 65% significant. I
mean, imagine yourself at a hospital, and you are told that guided
imagery may possibly improve your odds by 65%? I'd sign up...

I do note though that the stuff that worked required that patients
know about it. So yeah, it may well be one big placebo effect. But for
a 65% improvement in my odds I'd take a placebo, whether I understand
how it works or not. Matter of fact, I have made something of a hobby
of reading the patient information packet and you know what, 100% of
the ones I was taking last year said that themethod of action was not
understood.

Dana

On 7/16/05, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 12:29 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Prayers do not influence recovery from heart
> > cathereterization
> >
> > what's clinically significant to you? Personally, 65% more likely to
> > be alive would look pretty good to me ...
> >
> > http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2
> > 005-07-15T172140Z_01_B232717_RTRIDST_0_HEALTH-HEALING-TOUCH-DC.XML
> 
> I think in this case the meaning is that the effects are probably from side
> effects of the therapy (placebo effect, relaxation, etc) and not specific to
> the therapy itself.
> 
> Many "therapies" (therapeutic touch, hypnotism, massage, acupuncture,
> reflexology and many others) have similar effects when tested.  Do all of
> these (each with a completely different practitioner explanation of their
> effectiveness) do the same things in completely ways?  Or do each tap into
> some common source of benefit (such as the placebo effect)?
> 
> In any case I think that's what's meant by "statistically significant but
> not clinically significant".
> 
> Jim Davis
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
 Save $10 Download ZoneAlarm Security Suite 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=66

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:165003
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to