So I went camping/rafting this past weekend, at this "resort": http://www.thorntonsresort.com/
I checked the website last week before we left, and I was appalled at how ugly it was. It is really just god awful, and reminds me of some of the first websites from years and years and years ago. After going there, though, I realized this may actually be the best way for them to tell you what kind of establishment it is. The place was a hole in the wall. The bus (that they let us drink on) that drove us to the river *barely* made it (there were times we were rolling backwards down hills listening to the engine struggle). The bathrooms were out of soap and a lot of the fixtures didn't work. When we checked in, the guy was so trashed he pretty much told us to drive around until we found Site G-7, cause he couldn't remember where it was. So the question is - should their website be just as shitty to present this image? Would a decent looking site with normal navigation and not overloaded with stupid clipart/backgrounds be misleading? Should the look get a little better, and the information presented more clearly, but be given text like: 'rustic', 'laid back', 'real shit-hole'? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:165030 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
