I just don't think that qualifies it any. It's like saying, If
something really, really bad happens, we will respond in kind with a
stupid response. I don't think you can say the comment just applies to
nukes. It would have been wrong if he said atom bomb instead, or
biological warfare, whatever.

On 7/18/05, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again the question, has England been nuked? The article was based on a very
> specific question and a potential response to that specific question. Not an
> attack but a NUCLEAR attack. And if England finds that America has been
> supplying ideology, money, weapons and troops to the IRA then they would be
> within their rights AFTER A NUCLEAR ATTACK.
> 
> 
-- 
=======================================================================
Raymond Camden, Director of Development for Mindseye, Inc (www.mindseye.com)

Member of Team Macromedia (http://www.macromedia.com/go/teammacromedia)

Email    : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog     : ray.camdenfamily.com
Yahoo IM : cfjedimaster

"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:165121
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to