so you are saying that the factcheck article is proof that Wilson was
lying? I don't know about that.....

Dana

On 7/25/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That was in response to Dana's statement:
> > I have not seen this
> > anywhere, and while I am not actively researching the story, I am
> > following it in the media.
> 
> On 7/25/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> > > Sam wrote:
> > > Ironically, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who later called Bush's
> >
> > The fact is that the Whitehouse lied about it's involvement with a
> > leak of CIA operative thus compromising national security for decades
> > to come.  Mr. Wilson's actions are completely irrelevant to this
> > violation of Executive Order except as a motive.
> >
> > The Whitehouse leaked this information and has failed to comply with
> > it's own executive order.  It's a blatant case of 'who's watching the
> > watchers'.
> >
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:166257
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to