ummmmmmm not sure there may be a reasonable man test here. http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00001519----000-.html
It would appear to hinge on "knowingly" Dana On 7/28/05, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope. I think there is no obstruction of justice if they had not, yet, > been formally notified to preserve the documents. > > Another example of finer parsing than Clinton ever used. > > On 7/28/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sam wrote: > > > The gonzales story is old news. The rest of the blog is Bush bashing > > > nonsence, > > > > > > > Old and new. What's new is that Mr. Gonzales seems to have included > > Mr. Card in possible obstruction of justice. All they need to find is > > one shred of evidence that Mr. Card dumped files that they both might > > go down. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:167038 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
