Ahem. I think it *can* be a good situation, but the requirements for
this are such that it doesn't happen much. Obviously, the more
caregivers, the more care a child gets.

Dana

On 7/29/05, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wasn't trying to say that a single mother is a _good_ situation -
> just that family dynamics are complicated, and that in larger families
> things can be even more complicated.
> 
> My mom used to work for child protective services. The court's
> party-line was that removing kids from homes should be a last resort.
> Because of that, she saw kids that were too young to consistently
> testify, being forced to stay with parents that she knew abused them -
> burned by cigarettes, molested, etc. Statistically, most abusers come
> from abusive families. So, an extended family situation would most
> likely just mean more adults to abuse the kids.
> 
> There's definitely a difference between extended family and
> intentional communities - and I'm only speaking to the general concept
> of your family (and really only to the info that you've shared - that
> your dad was abusive and that your mom was an enabler of that abuse).
> 
> What it sounds like, to me, is that you wanted a _different_ family.
> 
> I haven't done any extensive reading on intentional communities. What
> little I've done is intriguing. There used to be a large one not so
> far from here - it was an artist's community. Of course, I can't
> remember the name of it. Harumph.
> 
> As to your comments about bedrooms getting smaller - that's odd - new
> houses here have big bedrooms and lots of them. I wonder if it's a
> regional thing....
> 
> On 7/28/05, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Well, if someone was going around cleaning up your
> > > father's landfill instead of say, kicking his ass
> > > out of the house, said someone would be just another
> > > member of a rather dysfunctional family, playing
> > > the typical role of caretaker.
> >
> > > No offense intended - but I'm just trying to point
> > > out that maybe what you needed was not more family,
> > > but less family.
> >
> > I'm not going to argue that a single mother is worse than an abusive
> > nuclear family, because I know that's not always the case... but I
> > don't think that one person in a nuclear family being abusive can be
> > justification to believe that a single mother is a _good_ situation
> > for a child to grow up with. There's a significant difference between
> > a better situation and a good situation. I prefer to advocate a good
> > situation rather than advocate a situation that is simply less evil.
> >
> > I'll respond to the other comments later... headed home for the day
> > right now.
> >
> > Thank you for taking the time to respond to the thread.
> >
> >
> > s. isaac dealey   954.522.6080
> > new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
> >
> > add features without fixtures with
> > the onTap open source framework
> >
> > http://www.fusiontap.com
> > http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:167279
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to