> -----Original Message-----
> From: DRE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 6:50 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Bush wants religion taught in the science classroom
> 
> What kills me is that ID is a product of evolution!  They couldnt get
> creationism into schools so they changed it to something that might.

Well - that's not really "evolution".  ;^)

Biological Evolution is a very useful metaphor for many processes: social,
economic, geological, anthropological, etc but none of them are really
"Evolution" in the biological sense (and it's only biological evolution
that's being challenged by ID).

But the argument still stands: ID is considered by many to be a "wedge"
strategy which is why it's fought to stridently.  This is borne out to at
least some degree by the fact that many vocal proponents of ID are also
Christian Fundamentalists.

The ID "movement" has a definite, organized "two prong" approach:

1) Add ID to current curricula.  They want their theory taught in schools.
This is actually quite odd, especially in science.  Very rarely do
proponents of a scientific idea lobby school boards for inclusion.  Rather
the idea becomes accepted in the broad, professional scientific community
first and is added "naturally".

2) Downgrade Evolution.  This is the worse side of things in my opinion.
Whether or not ID is added to the curricula IDers in general (or at least
the vocal ones) lobby to have Evolution disclaimed or, at worst, removed
from the required curricula.

Again, this is very odd in science.  Science is full of competing theories
and explanations but few are as generally accepted as Evolution.  Again this
is an attempt to circumvent the natural dissemination of science information
from research to professional acceptance to curricula.

There is little question in my mind that those IDers than are picketing
school boards and proposing disclaimers in schoolbooks are religiously
motivated.

However there are also IDers that are legitimate scientists.  They are
attempting to test their hypothesis and are working within the confines of
science.  They will defend their hypothesis but will also admit that much
more work needs to be done in the efforts to confirm it.

However these folks are unfortunately in the silent minority.

Jim Davis



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:167736
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to