Who would have thought that the court would allow local government to 
seize your land for economic gain?

Who would have thought that the 16th Amendment would be able to get the 
support of all the states and the legislature?

Who would have thought that we Americans would put people into camps 
based on race?

Who would have thought that we would use US against non-violent protesters?

Who would have thought that the Reserves and National Guard would have 
to bail out the active duty services?

Who would have thought that the FBI would be able to request your 
reading list without a warrant?

Who would have thought that a sitting president would have his staff 
burglarize an opponents office?

Who would have thought that the US would start assassinating people 
again (not that I am against this)?

I mean seriously.  All these things have happened at one time or another.

Tim

Robert Munn wrote:
> Anyone who seriously thinks such a plan could pass in Congress, be signed 
> into law by the President, or be upheld in federal courts needs to examine 
> the root causes of their extreme paranoia. 
> 
> You don't even have to go into any of the details of the plan to find a 
> Constitutional objection. On its face, such a plan would require forced 
> medical procedures on the entire population. Do you seriously think that 1. 
> courts would uphold the legality of the medical procedure or 2. doctors would 
> agree to perform the medical procedure on the ENTIRE population? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>Mmm..Came up with this all on his own did he?
>>
>>Tactfully ignoring that the idea has been bandied about several times,
>>and pushed hard by Verichip itself and mentioned by other members of
>>the current regime in the US.
>>
>>http://www.rednova.com/news/health/196561/health_chips_could_help_patients_in_us/
>>
>>If you can't see the negative implications of this for Privacy, then
>>you have no concern for your privacy.
>>If you can't see the implications for abuse, and violation of civil
>>rights, then you have no concept of civil rights, and I wouldn't know
>>where to begin explaining them to you.
>>
>>There is a Clear and Obvious difference between a Card that you must
>>show when requested, and a chip that can be used to broadcast your
>>location and whereabouts without your knowledge.
>>
>>To those that said it's a 'low power' signal that can not be tracked,
>>this has already been proven to be patently FALSE in recent threads
>>about RFID technology. It CAN be tracked by receivers of the correct
>>power and it CAN be tracked from a great distance and even easier if
>>there is a network of these receivers.
>>
>>If one cannot understand why dictatorships and totalitarian regimes
>>would love to have every member of the populace tagged and bagged then
>>one is under some rather rosy misconceptions about dictatorships and
>>totalitarian regimes.
> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
 Save $10 Download ZoneAlarm Security Suite 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=66

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:168441
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to