> -----Original Message----- > From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 2:04 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Attempt at a WDDX replacement... comments? > > The only thing I would disagree with would be this: > > >I could also take the route some have and attempt to minimize the > >dialect (just use "d", "t" and "f" instead of "data", "type" and > >"fields" and use single digits to represent the data types) but as > much >space as that would save it's always just annoyed me... > > Only because XML is supposed to be human readable.
Yeah - it's always annoyed me as well... but some people get really uptight about it. > Aside from that, and that fact that they are forcing you to reinvent the > wheel, it seems like it would be really flexible for different types of > data. Thanks... that's what I hope. Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:169327 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
