No, it was supposed to be lighthearted humor.
I was trying to say "read between the lines." When you make the
browser smaller that paragraph wraps into two lines.
Last night Dr. Savage asked Lt. Col. Shaffer if it was the Gorelick
wall and he kind of said yes, I missed parts. He said he had some of
the names of the lawyers that blocked them and were tracing them up to
the sources to find out the who and why.


On 8/17/05, John Dowdell wrote:

> ? Paragraph six of the linked NYT story is a single sentence, without
> mention of Gorelick, or her role in "the wall", or her failure to recuse
> when investigating herself. I'm guessing that you were using some
> sardonic humor there...?  ;-)
> 
> (My interest: It's always good to know how current events are framed,
> and the angles that different reporters and businesses both play up and
> ignore.)
> 
> jd
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:170086
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to