I'll agree with that, to a point. Though I do feel bad for the peaceful Muslim men out there. The point comes when we start diverting aircraft because someone named Islam has boarded and the president is low in the polls.
Dana On 8/26/05, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Who, you must admit, are just not as prevelent as the Mohammads and Alis. > > I look at it a lot like a SPAM filter. Not just one criteria should > necessarily flag something as spam, but certain criteria have been > shown to be much more reflective of a terrorist than others. > > Each criteria should be weighted SMARTLY using common sense gained > from years of successful profiling. > > But terrorist weighting should differ from SPAM filtering in that we > should lean towards less false negatives even if that means more false > positives. (As long as the false positives aren't treated with as much > finality as the London guy.) > > > On 8/26/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also, "muslim" comes to mean anyone > > brown-skinned, and overlooks the timothy mcveighs and john lindts. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Flash for programmers - Flash MX Pro http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=56 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:171266 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
