Sorry, I should have put a <sarcasm> by that yippee. It was a comment on the 
ridiculousness of the relief effort - not an exultation of the shoot to kill 
decision.

On 9/2/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> That's nice Jeff, I mean Deanna. So the terrorist deserve lawyers,
> trials and warm comfy rooms but someone that just lost everything and
> is running down the street with extra sneakers deserves a bullet in
> the head?
> If you're talking about the gunfire, from what I'm reading there was a
> shot fired at a rescue helicopter and the guy screamed "you better
> come get my family". Now I'm wondering if he pulled of a round to get
> their attention so they would save his family. How could he expect to
> be saved by shooting AT the rescuers?
> If you're referring to the people that held up a police and stole the
> food and water, I want to know why they had to take supplies by force.
> 
> 
> On 9/2/05, Deanna Schneider wrote:
> > On the local news this morning, they said that the National Guard now 
> has
> > shoot to kill orders. Yippee.
> 
> 
>


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:172311
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to